Author

Brett W. Todd - page 92

Brett W. Todd has 925 articles published.

Brett W. Todd is the managing editor of Clinton County Today. Clinton County Today is a community-focused website to provide individuals of Clinton County Indiana and surrounding areas with information impacting their lives. Clinton County Today is a service of Progressive Partners of Indiana, LLC where Brett W. Todd is its managing member.

Financial Constraints Makes City of Frankfort Public Safety Facility Not Feasible

Published on

Less than 30-days after the Frankfort City Council gave then-Mayor Chris McBarnes consensus to proceed to the next step on a proposed Public Saftey Facility, Councilman Eric Woods informed the full Council that “given our financial constraints, the way we are using LIT money, the discussions have basically showed that trying to do the fire at the same time (as police a station) is probably not feasible.”

Councilman Woods delivered the news during the old business portion of the Monday, March 9, 2020, City Council meeting after being asked by Mayor Judy Sheets to provide the Council an update.

“I have had some discussions with Judy and then some on-and-off with the finance committee discussions over the last few weeks,” said. Councilman Woods. “And, the issue we have folks and I think everybody knows is that the police department that had been talked about now for, I think three years solid if not more, The (proposed) location has been multiple locations. The previous Mayor (Chris McBarnes) definitely wanted to see it at the airport and that’s fine that he wanted that and proposed that and it did come to the Council. I believe we agreed by consensus that that was a reasonable place if nothing better came up. The problem though, I think we have, is this last-minute attempt to make it both a police station and fire station.”

Public Saftey Facilities are being built in other communities; however, Councilman Woods stated the City faces financial constraints in doing such a facility here.

“Although you are seeing public safety facilities go up in other communities and I think it makes sense financially and logistically in other places. But given our financial constraints, the way we are using LIT money, the discussions have basically showed that trying to do the fire at the same time is probably not feasible. This was backed up by Gary with Reedy (& Co – the City’s contracted financial analysts firm).”

The City could use planned annexation to add a fire station on the west side.

“So, the discussion kind of went along the lines of we all know we are going to need an engine company heading out west as we grow this community out to the west. Maybe we should consider adding that and the potential manpower to our annexation plan which is imminent.”

“I think all of the facts are there. I think the growth we are seeing, the infrastructure the county is laying in, it all makes sense. Public Saftey is probably the one thing the public will understand the most when we start talking about the plan and what is needed infrastructure wise.”

Taking a step backward if closing a firehouse to build another.

“And, the other thing here is I have talked to other people, and I am sure you have to. The notion of having to close an existing house station here, such as station 2 or 3, to make this new one happen out by the airport seems like it is moving backward.”

“So, if we can keep that and how our City is covered, especially given how we are set-up with railroad tracks, think that is in the communities best interest we push for that.”

“Of course we will not know anything until we really get into the annexation plan, but it seems doable and I am confident, and the Mayor is confident that the Airport Authority Board would still want to do business with us on this because we all know it is going to happen eventually.”

Regarding the February 10, 2020, Council meeting when the consensus was given to proceed to the next step, Councilman Woods explained there was some misconception in the community.

“There was, I think, a public thought we had okayed this plan last time and we had not. We (the council) just took it under advisement as a potential location.”

Councilman Woods would like to see CVS west facility explored again as a possible solution.

“So, I think now is the time to back-up and re-addressing the CVS west issue. I, myself, would like to see maybe one more shot for that as a police station, but to me, the important thing was the fire station being done the right way.”

Councilman Clarence Warthan spoke in support of making sure the police station was done correctly but does not support revisiting CVS.

“I have been on that committee all three years, I think,” said Councilman Warthan. “I agree the police station should not be cut back to try and get a fire station. I would like to see the police station fully done with the money we have available to do that.”

“I do think we need to add a fire station out there in the future and probably the sooner the better for the airport as well as us. As far as the CVS, we have tried that a couple of times and I am tired of trying, so I am not for that, but I am for the other part.”

Councilman Joe Palmer spoke of the railroad tracks and wanting to ensure fire protection was not cut-off.

“As most you know, I was on the fire department for quite a while,” said Councilman Palmer. “And, as long as there are tracks in this town there is a potential of getting some areas cut off. So, I have a hard time closing any fire station. I am not opposed to building a station out west somewhere, but I am in favor of down the road of trying to add some firefighters.”

Councilman Megan Sheets, who is also a member of the Board of Works, stated she wants the Council to mindful of looking at the longterm when making the decision to build a new police station.

“I think it is paramount importance to proceed with the police department with the list they find important and we do not scale back that list because we’re looking ahead in the future not wanting to build a police department for the next 20-years, we are wanting to build one for the next 30-50-years if that is at all possible, so we are not revisiting this so soon,” said, Councilman Sheets.

At the end of the discussion, Mayor Sheets asked for the Council’s Police Councilmatic committee to meet and work with the Council’s Finance committee to develop potential solutions.

The next City Council meeting is Monday, March 23, 2020, at 7 p.m. The next Board of Works meeting is immediately prior to at 5 p.m. Both meetings are held in the City Council Chamber at Old Stoney.

Frankfort City Council Discusses Travis Sheets’ $4,250 Agreement, Board Of Works Has Ultimate Decision

Published on

During the old business portion of the Frankfort City Council meeting Monday, March 9, 2020, Councilman Michael Brite raised the topic of the independent contractor agreement between the City of Frankfort and Travis Sheets.

“I know there is some concern with this Travis Sheets’ contract,” said Councilman Brite. “And, I think it needs to be addressed. There is an awful lot of public comment going on about it. I don’t want to put it off to the next meeting. I am going to give you my personal opinion on it if this is the right time.”

“We hired a gentleman (new Parks Superintendent Bart Kraning) and are paying him good money to make these kind of decisions. My personal thought on this, nobody forced Travis to leave. We hired someone to do this job and I think he is capable of doing the job. To pay Travis the amount of money we are paying him, I don’t think it is in the best interest of the citizens of Frankfort to be doing this.”

Councilman Brite then asked the Council for their thoughts on this matter.

Councilman Joe Palmer spoke first.

“It would be a big loss to this city if we lose him (Travis Sheets),” said Councilman Palmer. “I can tell you right now if he is gone here in the next couple of weeks we (the City) are going to spend $250,000 landscaping that park over there (Prairie Creek Park).”

Councilman Palmer then directed a question to Parks Superintendent Bart Kraning who was sitting in the audience.

“Bart, how familiar are you with a lot of plants?”

“If the job fell on me to plant them, I could get them done,” said Superintendent Kraning. “And, I am extremely confident I could get that done.”

Councilman Megan Sheets, who is also a member of the Board of Works, commented:

“I think we have a responsibility to meet with Travis because he does have a planned visit back here to the community in March. I would like for those of us, that need to, to sit down and discuss with Travis and reveal some expectations even if it is a short term arrangement, maybe not the full 18-month arrangement as the current contract is drawn up for.”

“So, rather making a quick decision and flipping the switch off, I would like for us to have some further conversations with Bart and Travis before we do that and deciding with the ending date should be.”

Councilman Steve Beardsley then directed a question to City Attorney Les Bergum as to whether this matter is legislative (Council) or executive (Mayor) decision.

“It’s an executive matter, the board of works,” said Bergum. “But that’s certainly not to say the council shouldn’t have some input.”

Councilman Palmer added:

“I am not defending Travis, I am defending his knowledge.”

“He has all of the plans. He knows the “ins and outs”. So, I hate to see that amount of information wasted. Yea, it’s costing us. But it would also cost us a lot more if we had to go outside the loop to do this.”

Both Councilman Palmer and Clarence Warthan commented they did not know if the duration of the contract needed to be 18-months long.

Mayor Judy Sheets then added, “Myself and the Board of Works have met and discussed this and we are going to put a plan in place. We intend to speak with Travis when he gets here in March and determine exactly what direction we want to go with this.”

Councilman Palmer spoke to Travis Sheets’ travel to Frankfort.

“He flies in on the 20th of this month and I think he starts on the 23rd.”

After the close of the City Council meeting, Councilman Brite spoke with Clinton County Today.

“I am not against Travis. My concern is two-fold. Number one, the public does not know what is going on. The council says this will save us money in the long run. I don’t have a problem with that, but we need to explain to the public how it’s going to save us money. And, we need to explain to them why we are not intrusting our new Parks Superintendent for this job.”

“To me, he is able to do it. I am all for with what Megan (Sheets) has stated with the council sitting down with Travis and the new Parks Superintendent and see what we can work out. I just want to make sure that as council members, we are responsible for those that put us in here and we are responsible to make sure they understand what is going on.”

“My other concern is though with all of the negative comments that I have been reading and hearing. Not one person showed up to this meeting to complain. So you can’t sit back and complain about something and then not show up to voice your concern here and let us know how you are feeling because that shows very little concern on those that have a problem with it.”

The next City Council meeting is Monday, March 23, 2020, at 7 p.m. The next Board of Works meeting is immediately prior to at 5 p.m. Both meetings are held in the City Council Chamber at Old Stoney.

Pay Increase For Frankfort Parks Superintendent Placed On Hold

Published on

During the Monday, March 9, 2020, Frankfort City Council meeting, City Attorney Les Bergum explained to the members of the City Council that Indiana Code 36-4-7-3 allows only the Mayor to increase or decrease a salary of specific positions, parks superintendent being one, once the salary budget has been set for the current year.

“As I read the statute, it is pretty clear,” said Bergum. “The Mayor, as executive, has the authority to increase or decrease the parks superintendent’s salary during the current year. So this would be Mayor Sheets’ responsibility.”

For the parks superintendent’s to have increased, previous Mayor Chris McBarnes would have had to issue an executive order. He did not do so.

Current Mayor Judy Sheets could take action via an executive order. “So, like in 60, 90-days if we do an evaluation and decide this is something we would like to do, I as the executive can do that with an executive order.”

With the information presented, Ordinance 20-04 died on its Second Reading.

$4,250 Per Month For Travis Sheets as Frankfort Parks Consultant On 18-Month Agreement

Published on

Clinton County Today has reviewed the Independent Contractor Agreement between the City of Frankfort and Travis Sheets. Sheets is to be paid monthly in the amount of $4,250 for 18-months. The contract became effective January 1, 2020, and runs until June 30, 2021, unless otherwise extended by written agreement signed by both parties.

An agreement reached by the City’s Board of Works and Sheets during the Mayor Chris McBarnes administration, calls for Sheets to be paid on the last day of each month during the agreement period. As the agreement is written, Sheets could be paid $76,500 over the 18-month period plus reimbursement for “transportation between the City of Frankfort and the Indianapolis Airport for trips required in connection with work performed or to be performed by Contractor pursuant to this agreement.” Or, “City shall provide transportation” between the City of Frankfort and the Indianapolis Airport for Sheets.

Sheets “shall be responsible for all traveling expenses to and from Indianapolis and Contractor’s residence in Arizona.”

The agreement does make note the work and pay for Sheets in 2021 is dependent upon the City Council budgeting process. Sheets’ “work to be performed in 2021 and any payments for work to be performed during 2021, shall be subject to appropriation of necessary funds by the Common Council of the City of Frankfort.”

In addition to monthly payment and reimbursement for transportation between Frankfort and the Indianapolis Airport, Sheets is to receive for use from the City of Frankfort when working in the Frankfort area, “a City owned vehicle and gasoline for use only in performing work described in this agreement.”

As Sheets will perform his consulting work remotely as well as in the City of Frankfort, “there shall be made available to Contractor sufficient desk, office area and supplies to conduct his work in the City of Frankfort, as needed.”

The agreement does allow for the agreement to be terminated with or without cause by either party with 30-days notice given to the other party. “This agreement may be terminated, with or without cause, by either party giving the other party 30 day’s written notice to terminate.”

Should the agreement terminate mid-month, Sheets is to receive prorated payment. “If this contract is terminated for any reason prior to the end of a month, the monthly amount paid hereunder shall be apportioned to reflect payment only for the portion of the calendar month during which services were performed.”

The Agreement states Sheets “holds expertise in various aspects of landscaping, zoo and aviary construction and operation, swimming pool operation and maintenance and various other construction and maintenance issues associated with parks and their capital improvements.”

And, the City “desires to utilize and benefit from Contractor’s expertise and to hire Contractor as an independent contractor to perform consulting, advisory and related services in connection with the park, zoo and aviary matters.”

The Agreement identifies Sheets’ general scope of work to include the following:
* Will serve as the owner representative for the design and construction process of the aquatic center
* Will advise on zoo and aviary habitats, health, and wellness needs and USDA regulations and requirements
* Will serve to prioritize capital projects
* Will assist in setting up the PCP kiosk as an appropriate park boutique
* Will serve as a resource regarding playground safety and regulations
* Will advise on horticulture issues
* Will advise on downtown pots and hanging baskets
* Will be available “as needed” for phone/email consultation

In addition to the above list, Sheets’ “shall perform … consulting, advisory and related services in connection with the City’s operation of its park area, zoo and aviary, using Contractor’s expertise to maintain and improve such areas in a modern, neat and safe condition. … Contractor shall make suggestions to employees of the City and shall review their findings and work in various projects.”

Under this Agreement, the hours Sheets works on any given day is entirely up to him. “… The hours the Contractor works on any given day shall be entirely within the Contractor’s control.”

The Agreement continues, “the City will rely upon the Contractor to put in such number of hours as is reasonably necessary to fulfill the spirit and purpose of this agreement.”

The City of Frankfort does state the dates Sheets “shall work in the City of Frankfort shall include, on a full-time basis,” the following:
* Three (3) weeks in March for greenhouse planting, general landscaping (where needed) and PCP landscaping.
* May 20th through July 5th for general operation, Fourth of July, capital projects and preparation for summer.
* Two (2) weeks in October to outline and prepare for Holiday Festival of Lights.
* Three (3) visits for consultation and work related to completion of the Prairie Creek Park Project and development and implementation of the TPA Park Aquatic Center Project.

Sheets must maintain his own motor vehicle insurance policy while operating a City of Frankfort vehicle. In addition to motor vehicle insurance, Sheets must pay by himself all required worker’s compensation insurance and unemployment compensation insurance for himself and his employees. Those items are in addition to general liability insurance and such other insurance as the City may require.

The Agreement was signed by Sheets and the three members of the Board of Works; Mayor Chris McBarnes, James Siegfried, Jr., and Kenneth Estes.

Jami Pratt New Center Township Trustee

Published on

The Republican Caucus met at 10 a.m. on Saturday, March 7, 2020, to hear from 4 candidates for Center Township Trustee.

Cory Boyles, Tom Bush, Jami Pratt, and Steve Teegarden each took 3-minutes explaining why they should become the next Center Township Trustee in front of 18 precinct committeemen in attendance.

Jami Pratt was selected on the first ballet receiving 10 votes.

Pratt will be sworn in Monday, March 9th at 9 a.m. in the Courthouse Clerks Office.

State of Indiana Releases School & School Corporation A-F Grades, Frankfort & Clinton Central Appeal Grade

Published on

The Office of Accountability for the Indiana Department of Education has released the 2018-2019 A-F Grades for Schools and School Corporations.

Public Law 2-2020, signed into law by Governor Holcomb on February 12, 2020, requires that a school’s A-F grade for the 2018-2019 school year may not be lower than that same school’s A-F grade for the 2017-2018 school year. In order to determine the final 2018-2019 A-F grade for each school, the Indiana Department of Education (Department) compared each school’s 2017-2018 grade to its 2018-2019 grade, as calculated pursuant to 511 IAC 6.2-10, and assigned the better grade received by the school between these two school years. Schools received all performance and accountability data for the 2018-2019 school year regardless of the hold harmless application.

The provided image shows the grades assigned to the respective schools and school corporations in Clinton County.

The Community Schools of Frankfort and Clinton Central School Corporation have each appealed its assigned corporation grade. They are 2 of 7 corporations in the state that have appealed.

Frankfort High School and Clinton Central Junior-Senior High School have each appealed its school grade. They are 2 of 9 schools in the state that have appealed.

Below is a breakdown of the Grades statewide:

2018-2019 Hold Harmless Grades for Corporations (289 School Corporations)

A: 50
B: 161
C: 66
D: 2
F: 2
N/A: 1
Appeal Pending: 7

2018-2019 Hold Harmless Grades for Schools (2,158 schools)

A: 680
B: 722
C: 423
D: 177
F: 69
N/A: 78
Appeal Pending: 9

Death Investigation Underway in Frankfort

Published on

On March 5, 2020, at approximately 7:15 a.m., The Frankfort Police Department, Frankfort Fire Department, and Clinton County EMS responded to Turtle Creek Apartments for an unresponsive child.

Upon arrival, a 4-month-old infant was found unresponsive and was transported to IU Health Frankfort Hospital. The infant was pronounced dead shortly after arrival. Detectives are investigating along with the Clinton County Coroner. More information will be released at a later time.

$4,720,735 To Take Water From Jefferson To I-65

Published on

With two (2) new projects recently announced at the I-65 & State Road 28 interchange (NHK manufacturing facility & Five Below distribution center), those respective projects are dependant upon the utility expansion from Jefferson to that area previously announced in June 2019.

During the Tuesday, March 3, 2020, County Commissioners meeting, Jon Query of HWC Engineering provided the Commissioners with a report on the bids for Divison “B” (Water Project) of the I-65 utility expansion from Jefferson. A total of six (6) bids were received.

The I-65 utility expansion project comprises two parts or divisions. Division “B” is the water portion while Division “A” is the sewer portion.

Division “A” of the project and has not been bid yet due to waiting on EDA grant funding status before that portion bids.

HWC Engineering received a total of six (6) bids on February 20, 2020, ranging from $4,720,735 to $5,635,390.

The low bidder was J.G. Case Construction Inc. of Muncie, IN. HWC Engineering has worked with J.G Case Construction Inc. on prior projects and “that work has all been acceptable and good,” said Query.

The low bid of $4,720,735 came back close to the revised estimated of $4,750,000. The biggest reason for the change in estimated project cost was the change from a 12″ to an 18″ water main.

HWC Engineering recommended the Commissioners accept the low bid from J.G. Case Contruction Inc. in the amount of $4,720,735 pending the final review from the financial advisor, Baker Tilly, and the funding agency, SRF.

“Given the schedule with the developments (at I-65), we need to proceed with this pretty quickly,” said Query. “They (the independent project developers) are wanting water service early next year…we need to get notice to proceed to the contractor in the next few weeks.”

“(I) was very pleased the amount of bidders that we received,” said Commissioner Josh Uitts. “It made it a competitive bid and I think we saw the results of that with the bid coming in right where we thought it would, our estimated budget.”

The Commissioners voted to accept the recommendation, 3-0.

1 … 90 91 92 93
Go to Top